What Should “Close Reading” Look Like in Elementary Classrooms?

In this article in The Reading Teacher, Douglas Fisher and Nancy Frey (San Diego State University) report on what struck a group of elementary teachers as they observed close reading in secondary English, social studies, and science classrooms. The elementary teachers found that six features differed from the way they taught reading:

  • Short passages – The texts that secondary teachers used for close reading ranged from three paragraphs to two pages. One high-school English teacher said, “My students read longer pieces on their own. When we really dig into a text, I use a shorter piece so that I can teach them skills for interrogating the ideas of the text.”
  • Complex texts – Secondary teachers had students do close reading with passages above their independent reading level.
  • Limited frontloading – The secondary teachers rarely commented on the passages before asking students to dive in and read. 
  • Repeated readings – Students often read the same text more than once, each time with a purpose or question in mind. Often teachers had students read the passage aloud the first time and subsequently read it aloud themselves with special emphasis. 
  • Text-dependent questions – Students were asked to provide evidence from the passage to answer their teachers’ questions. There were very few questions linking the passages to students’ personal experiences. 
  • Annotation – Secondary students often underlined, circled, wrote in the margins, or used sticky notes as they did close reading. 

The elementary teachers then identified ways they believe close reading needs to be modified in elementary classrooms:

More reading aloud by the teacher – This is particularly important in the lower grades to help students get the overall picture before getting into close reading.

Judicious frontloading – The elementary teachers agreed that not all passages needed vocabulary and concepts explained before students started reading – only when it couldn’t be figured out while reading the text. One teacher said, “I think we have to get the students to do the heavy lifting now and part of that is to make sure that students are thinking about the text each time they read it.” Elementary teachers also agreed that they shouldn’t ask questions about students’ personal experiences until they had read closely and gained a firm foundation of new knowledge. 

Text-dependent questions – The elementary teachers realized that many of the questions they asked about a book or passage drew out students’ personal experiences and could be answered without reading the text. They came up with types of questions that would get students to pay close attention to the words on the page:

  • Main idea and arguments
  • Key details 
  • Vocabulary and text structure
  • Author’s purpose
  • Inference
  • Opinion and inter-textual

Teaching annotation – Having students “read with a pencil” worried many of the elementary teachers; they didn’t want students to get in the habit of writing in classroom books. After much discussion, they agreed on how to phase in annotation, starting with wiki sticks to underline key ideas in big books to underlining major points and circling key words and phrases on a photocopy of a page in third grade to using arrows to make connections in sixth grade. 

“Close Reading in Elementary Schools” by Douglas Fisher and Nancy Frey in The Reading Teacher, November 2012 (Vol. 66, #3, p. 179-188), http://bit.ly/SBPs7l; Fisher can be reached at dfisher@mail.sdsu.edu, Frey at nfrey@mail.sdsu.edu


From the Marshall Memo #463

Views: 3427

Reply to This






School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe.  Our community is a subscription based paid service ($19.95/year)  which will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one our links below.


Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.


Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e. association, leadership teams)


Annual Membership Drive for Two Worthy Charities
During the Month of May each year, School Leadership 2.0 donates 100% of all new membership fees to worthy charities.

This year, we have chosen:

Talbot House of Catholic Charities to honor the memory of Bill Brennan's brother, Michael.

Michael K. Brennan MD (32) had just graduated Medical School and was spending a few weeks helping others who were struggling with substance abuse. Having just spent a week counseling his cousin, and on his way to bring him home to Florida,  Michael was the victim in a fatal car accident. Michael planned to pursue a career helping others with addictive behavior and his family is proud to honor his life of recovery and serving God. A donation will be made in honor of Michael K. Brennan, MD

LI 2Day Walk to honor the memory of Mike Keany's wife, Patricia.                                

The Long Island 2 Day Walk is organized to raise awareness and funding for the fight against cancer on Long Island. 100% of the donations raised by the participants are distributed to grassroots service organizations so the funds reach the members of the Long Island community affected by cancer.  Pat Keany was a victim of breast cancer in 2008.  The Keany family has been active participants in this organization for many years.

Obviously, we encourage additional donations to these two worthy charities.  Just click on the link(s) above and indicate your donation to Catholic Charities for Talbot House in honor of Michael K. Brennan, MD or to LI2Day "Team Hope."
We thank you.
Bill Brennan and Mike Keany

Amazon/SL 2.0 Book Store

School Leadership 2.0

© 2016   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Welcome to School Leadership 2.0, the professional learning network for school leaders from around the globe!